MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051964348 · doi:10.1109/jqe.2008.924430

Quadratic Electro-Optic Kerr Effect: Applications to Photonic Devices

2008· article· en· W2051964348 on OpenAlexaff
Montasir Qasymeh, Michael Čada, Sergey A. Ponomarenko

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKerr effectPhotonicsOpticsOptical switchGratingNonlinear opticsElectro-optic effectOptoelectronicsNonlinear systemIsotropyComputer sciencePhysicsMaterials scienceLaserElectric field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose novel applications of the quadratic electro-optic Kerr effect to photonic devices. Specifically in this work, two new illustrative examples are described, namely an electrically controlled multistable switch (ECMS), and an electrically tunable Bragg grating (ETBG). Their functionality is based on the third-order nonlinearity in an isotropic medium. On one hand, we note that the first key feature is the all-optical as well as electro-optical control/tunability. This can be achieved only in the third-order nonlinear material as opposed to a more frequently used linear electro-optic effect exploited in optical crystals. On the other hand, the second important key feature is the availability of integrated and compatible materials that show third order nonlinearity. In the first application proposed here, ECMS, the interplay between the quadratic electro-optic and all-optical Kerr effects is crucial for its tunable operation and leads to an interesting feature of storing an electrical information optically. In the second example, ETBG, employing the quadratic electro-optic effect makes it attractive thanks to the existence of the third-order nonlinearity in many interesting isotropic materials that are suitable for device integration. Devices such as modulators, switches, mixers, variable attenuators or optical limiters can be designed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Quantum ElectronicsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207