Cloning and comparative analysis of the bovine, porcine, and equine sex chromosome genes<i>ZFX</i>and<i>ZFY</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A growing body of evidence suggests the involvement of sex chromosome genes in mammalian development. We report the cloning and characterization of the complete coding regions of the bovine Y chromosome ZFY and X chromosome ZFX genes, and partial coding regions of porcine and equine ZFX and ZFY genes. Bovine ZFY and ZFX are highly similar to each other and to ZFX and ZFY from other species. While bovine and human ZFY proteins are both 801 amino acids long, bovine ZFX is 5 amino acids shorter than human ZFX. Like in humans, both bovine ZFY and ZFX contain 13 zinc finger motifs and belong to the Krueppel family of C2H2-type zinc finger proteins. The internal exon-intron organization of the bovine, porcine and equine ZFX and ZFY genes has been determined and compared. Within this region, the exon lengths and the positions of the splice sites are conserved, further suggesting a high evolutionary conservation of the ZFX and ZFY genes. Additionally, new alternatively spliced forms of human ZFX have been identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".