Muonium defect levels in Czochralski-grown silicon-germanium alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report Muonium (Mu) donor and acceptor levels in Czochralski-grown Silicon Germanium alloys $({\text{Cz-Si}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\text{Ge}}_{x})$. Measurement of these defect energies provides an analogous examination of Hydrogen defects that are otherwise inaccessible. Temperature-dependent Muonium fractions in several alloy samples $(x=0.20,0.45,0.77,0.81,0.84,0.90,0.91,0.94,0.98)$ show charge-state transitions assigned to Mu donor and acceptor ionizations. Our results indicate a deep Mu donor level across the alloy system. The Mu acceptor level is deep in pure Si and valence-band resonant in pure Ge; we specifically examine the compositional dependence of the ${\text{Mu}}_{\text{T}}^{0}$ acceptor ionization energy in Ge-rich alloys, where this level crosses into the valence band.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".