MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051987577 · doi:10.2351/1.2795755

Novel technique for laser lap welding of zinc coated sheet steels

2007· article· en· W2051987577 on OpenAlexaff
X. Li, S. Lawson, Y. Zhou, Frank Goodwin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Laser Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceWeldingLaser beam weldingMetallurgyLap jointAluminiumAlloyElectric resistance weldingHeat-affected zoneFOIL methodLaserBoiling pointComposite materialOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When zinc coated steels are laser welded, zinc adjacent to the weld bead is vaporized and will cause serious weld pool disruption in lap welding unless special measures are applied such as provision of a joint gap for vapor venting. A novel alternative technique has been developed to stabilize laser lap welding: this involves addition of a small amount of aluminum to the faying surface region, so that a liquid Al–Zn alloy of high boiling point is formed, thus lowering the Zn vapor pressure. Lap welds have been made with good process stability using Nd: yttrium–aluminum–garnet and direct diode lasers, and with added Al in the form of inserted foil or previously applied cold sprayed coatings. The development is described in U.S. Patent Application No. 11/226,834. Process optimization is currently under way to define optimum aluminum addition rates that will reliably suppress defects while minimizing Al uptake into the steel weld pool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Laser ApplicationsSame topicWelding Techniques and Residual StressesFrench-language works237,207