MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low postoperative hematocrit increases cerebrovascular damage after hypothermic circulatory arrest

2005· article· en· W2051988508 on OpenAlexaff
Dominique Shum‐Tim, Derek MacDonald, Takayuki Saito, Eric Lalibert, Jenny Chen, Al-Maleek Jamal, Anie Philip, Robert W. Platt

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOncotic pressureHematocritCardiopulmonary bypassAnesthesiaCirculatory systemOxygenationDeep hypothermic circulatory arrestCerebral perfusion pressureInternal medicineCerebral blood flowAlbumin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the systemic and cerebral effects of different postoperative hematocrit management following cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. DESIGN: Animal case study. SETTING: Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Four-week-old Yorkshire piglets. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve piglets were subjected to cardiopulmonary bypass (hematocrit = 25%) and 100 mins of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (15 degrees C). After weaning cardiopulmonary bypass, they were randomized to either group L or H, in which the postoperative hematocrit was maintained approximately 20% vs. approximately 30%, respectively, and survived for 6 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Changes in body weight, bioimpedance, and colloid oncotic pressure were assessed. Near-infrared spectroscopy and immunohistochemical assays for cerebral transforming growth factor-beta(1) and caspase-3 were performed. Postoperative weight gain (kg) and decreases in bioimpedance (ohms) were significantly less in group H (1.5 +/- 0.2 [H] vs. 2.4 +/- 0.6 [L], p = .01; 39.3 +/- 15.5 [H] vs. 89.1 +/- 29.6 [L], p = .01). Mean colloid oncotic pressure (mm Hg) was significantly higher in group H (10.8 +/- 1.6 [H] vs. 8.2 +/- 0.8 [L], p = .01) at 6 hrs postoperatively. Oxyhemoglobin, oxidized cytochrome aa(3) (muM x differential path-length factor), and tissue oxygenation index (%) were significantly better in group H (65.7 +/- 31.8 [H] vs. -104.7 +/- 55.2 [L], p = .0001; 0.52 +/- 4.1 [H] vs. -12.8 +/- 6.1 [L], p = .0001, and 55.7 +/- 4.6% [H] vs. 45.3 +/- 6.4% [L], p = .004, respectively). Cerebral transforming growth factor-beta(1) and caspase-3 scores were significantly better in group H (3.0 +/- 0.6 [H] vs. 1.9 +/- 0.9 [L], p = .04 and 1.8 +/- 0.5 [H] vs. 3.2 +/- 0.8 [L], p = .02, respectively). Mean arterial pressure (mm Hg) was consistently higher with group H (94.7 +/- 13.0 [H] vs. 78.3 +/- 11.5 [L], p = .003) despite comparable central venous pressure ( approximately 11 mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: Lower postoperative hematocrit was associated with increased fluid retention, lower perfusion pressure, and worse cerebrovascular injury following deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Postoperative hematocrit management may have profound systemic and cerebral effects after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and merits further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207