Climate sensitivity of trembling aspen radial growth along a productivity gradient in northeastern British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Growth–climate relationships were analyzed for 15 stands of trembling aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx.) along a productivity gradient in northeastern British Columbia. Productivity was evaluated with a site index model whose values varied between 6.65 and 26.93 m height at age 50 years. To assess the role of climate on radial growth, we built a tree-ring chronology for each site and then performed a dendroclimatic analysis by means of bootstrapped correlation functions using monthly and annual climatic variables. We found that trembling aspen sensitivity to climate varied across stands with different productivities in the study area. At the more productive sites, trees were more sensitive to climate, and ring widths were positively correlated, particularly with summer month precipitation prior to the year of growth. The different responses to climate along the productivity gradient are likely related to the differences in substrate properties; substrates at the more productive sites are richer in nutrients and have a better water holding capacity than those of the less productive sites. Our study suggests that the effects of future climate change on tree growth may not only increase towards the limit of a species distribution, but also towards richer and wetter stands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".