MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052019598 · doi:10.1080/01650250143000571

The contribution of adults' nonverbal cues and children's shyness to the development of rapport between adults and preschool children

2003· article· en· W2052019598 on OpenAlex
Ken J. Rotenberg, Nancy Eisenberg, Christine M. Cumming, Ashlee N. Smith, M. S. Singh, Elizabeth Terlicher

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Behavioral Development · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShynessPsychologyGazeDevelopmental psychologyNonverbal communicationPerceptionTrustworthinessSocial psychologyAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the study, 63 American preschool children (mean age 4 years, 8 months) were approached and read stories by adult testers who displayed high versus low frequencies of smiling and gaze. After being read to, the testers elicited self-disclosure from the children and later the children rated the trustworthiness and likeability of the tester (rapport measures). As additional measures of rapport, the children's smiling, gaze, and lack of nervousness in the interactions were observed. The results indicated that the development of rapport with children was greater when the adult tester displayed high rather than low frequencies of smiling but not gaze. Children's shyness also contributed to the development of rapport. Shyness was negatively associated with rapport perceptions/behaviours and, in the case of attributed trustworthiness, moderated the effects of adults' gaze.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it