L‐type Ca<sup>2+</sup> channel expression along feline smooth muscle oesophagus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Muscle from the proximal smooth muscle (SM) oesophagus of the cat demonstrates contractions of greater amplitude and greater sensitivity to cholinergic stimulation than muscle from the distal SM oesophagus. In the light of the central role of calcium influx in SM contractility, we hypothesized that regional differences in oesophageal contractility may be associated with differential expression of L-type calcium channels (L(Ca)) along the SM oesophagus. L(Ca) expression was compared between proximal and distal regions of the circular SM oesophagus by Western blots. Patch clamp technique was utilized to study L(Ca) currents. Muscle strip studies assessed L(Ca) contribution to contractile activity. The protein expression of L(Ca) and L(Ca) current density was greater in the proximal than distal region. L(Ca) voltage and time-dependent activation and inactivation curves were similar in cells from both regions. Stimulation of muscle strips with acetylcholine (ACh) in the presence of tetrodotoxin resulted in contractions of greater amplitude in the proximal region. The L(Ca) agonist Bay K 8644 caused a greater increase in ACh-induced contraction amplitude in muscle strips from the proximal region. Therefore, regional myogenic differences in L(Ca) expression along the circular SM oesophageal body exist and may contribute to the nature of oesophageal contractions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".