Glyoxylate and Pyruvate Are Antagonistic Effectors of the Escherichia coli IclR Transcriptional Regulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Escherichia coli isocitrate lyase regulator (IclR) regulates the expression of the glyoxylate bypass operon (aceBAK). Founding member of a large family of common fold transcriptional regulators, IclR comprises a DNA binding domain that interacts with the operator sequence and a C-terminal domain (C-IclR) that binds a hitherto unknown small molecule. We screened a chemical library of more than 150 metabolic scaffolds using a high-throughput protein stability assay to identify molecules that bind IclR and then tested the active compounds in in vitro assays of operator binding. Glyoxylate and pyruvate, identified by this method, bound the C-IclR domain with KD values of 0.9+/-0.2 and 156.2+/-7.9 microM, as defined by isothermal titration calorimetry. Both compounds altered IclR interactions with operator DNA in electrophoretic mobility shift assays but showed an antagonistic effect. Glyoxylate disrupted the formation of the IclR/operator complex in vitro by favoring the inactive dimeric state of the protein, whereas pyruvate increased the binding of IclR to the aceBAK promoter by stabilizing the active tetrameric form of the protein. Structures of the C-IclR domain alone and in complex with each effector were determined at 2.3 A, confirming the binding of both molecules in the effector recognition site previously characterized for the other representative of the family, the E. coli AllR regulator. Site-directed mutagenesis demonstrated the importance of hydrophobic patch formed by Met-146, Leu-154, Leu-220, and Leu-143 in interactions with effector molecules. In general, our strategy of combining chemical screens with functional assays and structural studies has uncovered two small molecules with antagonistic effects that regulate the IclR-dependent transcription of the aceBAK operon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".