Valproic Acid Increases CXCR4 Expression in Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells by Chromatin Remodeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A major limitation of cord blood (CB) hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) transplantation in adult patients is the low cell dose available, which is associated with delayed or failed engraftment. This has prompted intensive research to develop novel strategies to improve HSPC engraftment and reconstitution. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1alpha play a crucial role in the homing and repopulation capacity of HSPCs. We hypothesized that in HSPCs the CXCR4 receptor is regulated through chromatin remodeling by histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDIs) such as valproic acid (VPA). Using CB CD34(+) cells and the models of immature hematopoietic cells expressing CD34 antigen, namely the leukemic cell lines KG-1a and KG-1, we found that VPA increases surface and mRNA CXCR4 levels in these cells, thereby enhancing their migration toward an SDF-1alpha gradient. We also found that modulation of CXCR4 gene transcription by VPA correlates with the acetylation status of histone H4 in CB CD34(+) and KG-1 cells. Hence we suggest that in CB transplantation priming of HSPCs with VPA could improve homing and engraftment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".