L'aide sociale et le prêt, les droits extrapatrimoniaux et l'assurance-chômage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies different aspects of a particular concept of social welfare, namely assistance in the form of a loan versus standard nonrefundable assistance. It begins with an historical and jurisprudential analysis of section 13 of the Social Welfare Act which allows this kind of loan. This background is essential for grasping the goals and the bearing of the Social Welfare Act. This study mainly covers two situations which have raised and still are raising numerous controversies. First, an analysis is made of conditions and prospects of people requesting a loan from Social Welfare while awaiting unemployment compensations. Second, the study focuses on important litigation between beneficiaries of Social Welfare who have been granted extrapatrimonial damages and how the interpretation to be given to section 13 of this Act has been administered. Not only is an attempt made to determine the Social Affaires Commission's standpoint on these two matters, but the study also assesses the view of the Civil courts. Finally, within the scope of this study, the latest amendments to section 13 are reviewed and commented upon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".