MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052104041 · doi:10.1063/1.3095772

Noncommutative reading of the complex plane through Delone sequences

2009· article· en· W2052104041 on OpenAlexaff
S. Twareque Ali, Lubka Balkova, Evaldo M. F. Curado, Jean‐Pierre Gazeau, M. A. Rego-Monteiro, Ligia M. C. S. Rodrigues, K. Sekimoto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoncommutative geometryCoherent statesMathematicsComplex planeHarmonic oscillatorPhase spaceCreation and annihilation operatorsNoncommutative quantum field theoryPlane (geometry)GaussianNoncommutative algebraic geometryMathematical analysisPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsPhysicsQuantumGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Berezin–Klauder–Toeplitz (“anti-Wick”) quantization or “noncommutative reading” of the complex plane, viewed as the phase space of a particle moving on the line, is derived from the resolution of the unity provided by the standard (or Gaussian) coherent states. The construction of these states and their attractive properties are essentially based on the energy spectrum of the harmonic oscillator, that is, on the natural numbers. This work is an attempt for following the same path by considering sequences of non-negative numbers which are not “too far” from the natural numbers. In particular, we examine the consequences of such perturbations on the noncommutative reading of the complex plane in terms of its probabilistic, functional, and localization aspects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207