The influence of overstorey Populus on epiphytic lichens in subboreal spruce forests of British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The composition and abundance of lichen communities on conifer saplings beneath five overstorey tree species were compared at three subboreal forest site types in east-central British Columbia. Site-level differences in lichen communities were attributed to different levels of moisture and light limitations in the understorey. At sites with adequate moisture and light, cyanolichens were uniformly abundant and species rich on conifer saplings beneath different understorey species. However, at sites with moisture or light limitations, cyanolichens were more abundant and species rich on conifer saplings beneath overstorey Populus than on saplings beneath other overstorey tree species. Cyanolichen communities also showed greater species richness on conifer saplings beneath the Populus canopy than on the trunk of Populus itself. Differences in calcium, phosphorus, molybdenum, and manganese availability in throughfall precipitation failed to explain much of the variation in lichen community structure. These results suggest that Populus can facilitate cyanolichens under sub optimal moisture or light conditions by providing some, as yet unknown, factor that is critical to their establishment and growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".