Diruthenium–Polyyn-diyl–Diruthenium Wires: Electronic Coupling in the Long Distance Regime
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reported herein is a series of Ru2(Xap)4 capped polyyn-diyl compounds, where Xap is either 2-anilinopyridinate (ap) or its aniline substituted derivatives. Symmetric [Ru2(Xap)4](μ-C4k)[Ru2(Xap)4] (compounds 4ka (X = 3-isobutoxy) and 4kc (X = 3,5-dimethoxy) with k = 2, 3, 4, and 5) was obtained from the Glaser coupling reaction of Ru2(Xap)4(C2kH). Unsymmetric [Ru2(Xap)4](μ-C(4k+2))[Ru2(ap)4] (compounds 4k+2b with k = 2, 3, and 4) were prepared from the Glaser coupling reaction between Ru2(Xap)4(C(2k+2)H) and Ru2(ap)4(C2kH). X-ray diffraction study of compound 12c revealed both the sigmoidal topology of the polyyn-diyl bridge and the fine structural detail about the Ru2 cores. Cyclic and differential pulse voltammetric (CV and DPV) measurements and spectroelectrochemical studies revealed that (i) the reduced monoanions [Ru2-C2m-Ru2](-1) (m = 4-8) belong to the Robin-Day class II mixed valent ions and (ii) the electronic coupling between Ru2 termini depends on the length of the polyyn-diyl bridge with an attenuation constant (γ) between 0.12 and 0.15 Å(-1). In addition, spin-unrestricted DFT calculations provide insight about the nature of orbitals that mediate the long distance electronic coupling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it