Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a hybrid architecture based on a combination of fuzzy systems and polynomial neural networks. The resulting Hybrid Fuzzy Polynomial Neural Networks (HFPNN) dwells on the ideas of fuzzy rule-based computing and polynomial neural networks. The structure of the network comprises of fuzzy polynomial neurons (FPNs) forming the nodes of the first (input) layer of the HFPNN and polynomial neurons (PNs) that are located in the consecutive layers of the network. In the FPN (that forms a fuzzy inference system), the generic rules assume the form "if A then y = P(x) " where A is fuzzy relation in the condition space while P(x) is a polynomial standing in the conclusion part of the rule. The conclusion part of the rules, especially the regression polynomial uses several types of high-order polynomials such as constant, linear, quadratic, and modified quadratic. As the premise part of the rules, both triangular and Gaussian-like membership functions are considered. Each PN of the network realizes a polynomial type of partial description (PD) of the mapping between input and out variables. HFPNN is a flexible neural architecture whose structure is based on the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and developed through learning. In particular, the number of layers of the PNN is not fixed in advance but is generated in a dynamic way. The experimental part of the study involves two representative numerical examples such as chaotic time series and Box-Jenkins gas furnace data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".