Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: barriers to and facilitators of screening and disease management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a hereditary cancer syndrome in which confirmed carriers of a gene mutation are at high risk for colorectal (CRC) and extracolonic cancers. The purpose of the current study was to develop a greater understanding of the factors influencing the decision-making of confirmed HNPCC carriers post-genetic testing about screening and disease management. The study used a grounded theory approach to data collection and analysis as part of a multiphase project examining the psychosocial and behavioral impact of genetic counselling and DNA testing for HNPCC on individuals in high risk families with the MSH2 intron 5 splice site mutation or exon 8 deletion. The data from confirmed carriers (n=23) were subjected to re-analysis for the purpose of identifying key barriers to and/or facilitators of effective screening and disease management. Thematic analysis identified personal, health care provider and health care system as the dominant barriers to and facilitators of screening and disease management. Person-centered barriers/facilitators included (1) risk perceptions and decision-making and, (2) enduring screening/disease management. Provider barriers/facilitators were defined in terms of participant perceptions of physician awareness of the family history of HNPCC, knowledge of the disease and recommended screening/treatment protocols, and clinical management skills. The health care system barriers/facilitators were defined in terms of continuity of care and coordination of services among different providers. Individuals at high risk for HPNCC-related cancers often encounter multiple barriers to and facilitators of screening and disease management that go beyond the individual and family to the provider and health care system levels. The current organization and implementation of health care services for clients who are at high genetic risk of developing cancer is inadequate. A coordinated system of local services capable of providing integrated, efficient health care and follow-up, populated by health care providers with knowledge of inherited cancer, is necessary to maintain optimal health in these families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".