MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052152830 · doi:10.4141/a99-027

Beta-adrenergic receptors in skeletal muscles of ruminants: Effects of temperature and feed intake

2000· article· en· W2052152830 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
E. D. Ekpe, Jacob A. Moibi, R. J. Christopherson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPharmacological Effects and Assays
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInternal medicineReceptorChemistryEndocrinologySkeletal muscleAdrenergic receptorBicepsDihydroalprenololAnimal scienceBiologyBiochemistryAnatomyAgonistMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adrenergic receptors mediate effects of catecholamines on physiological processes including protein and energy metabolism. We determined the effects of temperature and feed intake on beta-1 and beta-2 adrenergic receptors (β1 AR and β2 AR) in skeletal muscle of lambs to assess the potential to modify physiological responses through adrenergic receptors. Twenty-four wether lambs received either restricted (R) or ad libitum (A) levels of feed intake, and were exposed to either cold (C; 0 ± 2 °C) or warm (W; 23 ± 2 °C) temperatures, resulting in four experimental treatment groups (WA, WR, CA and CR). At the end of 4 mo the lambs were slaughtered and biceps femoris, semitendinosus and gastrocnemius muscles were harvested for isolation of plasma membrane. Binding of [ 3 H]dihydroalprenolol to crude plasma membrane was used to determine the β AR densities and binding affinities (Kd). The densities of β1 AR were 28.02 ± 4.17, 40.68 ± 2.26, 28.99 ± 4.68 and 55.56 ± 6.05 fmol mg −1 protein for biceps femoris, 29.35 ± 1.49, 35.34 ± 2.59, 28.36 ± 2.94 and 37.89 ± 3.30 fmol mg −1 protein for gastrocnemius, and 22.66 ± 2.66, 31.21 ± 4.65, 21.84 ± 1.81 and 38.62 ± 3.67 fmol mg −1 protein for semitendinosus, for WA, WR, CA and CR, respectively. The Kd values for all groups ranged from 1.7 to 8.5 nM for β1 AR. Feed restriction increased (P < 0.01) the density of β1 AR in both environments but there was no significant effect of temperature. β1 AR densities and binding affinities were significantly higher in biceps femoris than in gastrocnemius and semitendinosus muscles when feed intake was restricted. The densities of β2 AR ranged from 9.0 to 16.0 fmol mg −1 protein. There was no effect of treatments on the density or receptor binding affinity of β2 AR in muscles. It is concluded that feed restriction causes increased density of β1 AR in sheep and that feed restriction could potentially increase the metabolic responsiveness of skeletal muscle to elevated levels of catecholamines. Key words: Catecholamine receptors, skeletal muscle, temperature, feed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicPharmacological Effects and AssaysFrench-language works237,207