MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052155239 · doi:10.1136/jech-2013-203098.8

IMPROVEMENT OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN PREDIABETIC AND TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY (LSG) IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR

2013· article· en· W2052155239 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kendra Lester, Laurie Twells, Deborah M. Gregory, Christopher S. Kovács, Jordan Gamble

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrediabetesGlycemicType 2 diabetesInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 Diabetes MellitusPopulationSurgeryGastroenterologyInsulinEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) has the highest prevalence of diabetes in the country. In 2011, 11.1% of the population were identified as diabetic. LSG is a minimally invasive and irreversible procedure in which 80% of the stomach is removed, leaving a much smaller stomach or “sleeve”. It is a promising treatment option for obesity, and recent studies demonstrate that LSG may be effective in improving/resolving T2DM in obese patients. Objectives This study is evaluating LSG and its effectiveness in the improvement of glycemic control in prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods All patients (n=66) undergoing LSG in NL since May 2011 are followed prospectively. Patients are classified as having prediabetes (HbA1c: 5.7–6.4% or FPG: 6.1–6.9 mmol/L) or T2DM (HbA1c>6.5% or FPG≥7.0 mmol/L, self-reported, or antidiabetic medication use) at baseline. Glycemic control is evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients experiencing improved glycemic control. Results At baseline, 16 (24.2%) patients have prediabetes (average HbA1c 5.8% (SD 0.3), FPG 5.6 mmol/L (SD 0.7)) and 31 (47.0%) have T2DM (average HbA1c 7.6% (SD 1.4), FPG 8.1 mmol/L (SD 2.5)). Interim analysis within 6 months post-surgery: of the 11 prediabetic patients who've completed follow-up, 8 (72.7%) have HbA1c<5.7% (p=0.004) and 11 (100%) FPG<6.1 mmol/L; of T2DM patients who've completed follow-up, 12 of 19 (63.2%) have HbA1c<6.5% (p<0.001) and 14 of 17 (82.4%) have FPG<7.0 mmol/L (p=0.003). Prediabetes and T2DM groups show significant improvements in HbA1c (-0.6% and -1.5% respectively) and FPG (-1.0 mmol/L and -2.0 mmol/L respectively), p<0.001 for all. 9 of 21 T2DM patients (42.9%) who completed follow-up are no longer taking antidiabetic medications. Conclusions Interim analysis indicates better glucose control is achieved within 6 months following LSG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Epidemiology & Community HealthSame topicBariatric Surgery and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207