<i>Pythium sulcatum</i> and <i>P. ultimum</i> as causal agents of cavity spot disease of carrots in Egypt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a survey of carrot diseases of the Nile delta region of northern Egypt, Pythium sulcatum (Pratt and Mitchell) and P. ultimum (Trow) were isolated from 74 and 26%, respectively, of carrot roots showing cavity spot disease. In laboratory and glasshouse pathogenicity tests, P. sulcatum caused significantly (P < 0.05) more severe damage than P. ultimum. The greater level of pathogenicity of P. sulcatum was associated with its ability to produce a wider array of cell-wall-degrading enzymes with significantly (P < 0.05) higher enzymatic activities compared to P. ultimum. Polygalacturonase, pectin lyase, pectate lyase and cellulase were detected in cavity spot lesions induced by both P. sulcatum and P. ultimum. Pectin methylesterase was detected in tissues invaded by P. sulcatum and not by P. ultimum. This is the first record of cavity spot disease of carrots in Egypt and indicates P. sulcatum and P. ultimum as the causal agents of this disease in the region surveyed. Key words: Carrots, cavity spot, cell-wall-degrading enzymes, Egypt, Pythium
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".