A Flexible Control Strategy for Grid-Connected and Islanded Microgrids With Enhanced Stability Using Nonlinear Microgrid Stabilizer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The energy sector is moving into the era of distributed generation (DG) and microgrids (MGs). The stability and operation aspects of converter-dominated DG MGs, however, are faced by many challenges. Important among these, are: 1) the absence of physical inertia; 2) comparable size of power converters; 3) mutual interactions among generators; 4) islanding detection delays; and 5) large sudden disturbances associated with transition to islanded mode, grid restoration, and load power changes. To overcome these difficulties, this paper presents a new large-signal-based control topology for DG power converters that is suitable for both grid-connected and islanding modes of operation without any need to reconfigure the control system and without islanding detection. To improve MG stability, the proposed control structure is realized via two steps. First, an emulated inertia and damping functions are adopted. Second, to guarantee stability and high performance of the MG system during sudden harsh transients such as islanding, grid reconnection, and large load power changes, a nonlinear MG stabilizer is proposed. An augmented converter model is developed and used to design the MG stabilizer via the adaptive backstepping (AB) technique to guarantee large-angle stability and robustness against unmodeled dynamics. Theoretical analysis and evaluation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme in achieving stable and smooth operation of a MG system in grid-connected, islanding, and transition modes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".