MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052308331 · doi:10.1021/la0340100

Thermodynamic and Aggregation Properties of Gemini Surfactants with Ethoxylated Spacers in Aqueous Solution

2003· article· en· W2052308331 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMicelleThermodynamics of micellizationEnthalpyAggregation numberAqueous solutionCritical micelle concentrationGibbs free energyEthylene oxideBromideKrafft temperaturePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Critical micelle concentration (cmc), degree of micelle ionization (α), headgroup area ( a 0 ), enthalpy of micellization (Δ H ° M ), and volume of micellization (Δ V φ,M ) properties are reported for a series of (oligooxa)alkanediyl-α,ω-bis(dimethyldodecylammonium bromide) gemini surfactants, 12−EO x −12 ( x = 0−3), having several ethylene oxide moieties within the spacer group. The cmc and headgroup areas are observed to increase with an increase in the number of EO groups in the spacer, in contrast to the complex behavior of gemini surfactants ( m − s − m ) having a normal hydrocarbon chain. Also, the Δ H ° M increases (becomes less exothermic) and Δ V M decreases with an increase in the number of EO groups in the spacer. These observations are rationalized in terms of changes in the hydration and conformation of the spacer group at the micelle−bulk solution interface. Gibbs energies of micellization, Δ G ° M, and entropies of micellization, Δ S ° M, are calculated from the Δ H ° M, cmc, and α values. The results indicate that the micellization process for these surfactants is entropy-driven.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it