MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052361010 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm156

Surgical referral in symptomatic mitral regurgitation: greater compliance with guidelines is needed

2007· letter· en· W2052361010 on OpenAlexaff
Angeline Law, K.-L. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReferralMitral regurgitationCompliance (psychology)CardiologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineSurgeryFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significant valvular heart disease is a common public health problem with an overall prevalence of 2.5% which increases to 13% of the population aged 75 years and older.1 It will become an increasingly important problem as the baby-boomer population ages in the western world in the coming decades, because the burden of all forms of valve disease increases with age. Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common form of valve disease, and patients with severe MR can remain asymptomatic for many years.1 Once symptoms develop, these patients should undergo valve surgery.2 The study by Mirabel et al.3 provides important information as to why some symptomatic patients with severe MR are not referred for surgery. Their findings are based on the prospective Euro Heart Survey of patients with valvular heart disease conducted in 92 European centres in 2001. They examined the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with symptomatic severe MR (3+ and 4+) who were not referred for surgery and these patients accounted for about half of the 396 patients with severe symptomatic MR. Of those who underwent surgery, 41% had mitral valve repair. Many of the characteristics of patients not referred for surgery are expected and consistent with clinical practice. These patients were older and had lower ejection fraction (EF) and more co-morbidities. It is easy to understand the reluctance to perform mitral valve surgery in the elderly as they have limited life expectancy and higher operative mortality when compared with the younger age group. However, age by itself should not be a contraindication of surgery, because elderly patients derive similar benefits in terms of amelioration of symptoms and improved survival compared with younger patients.4 The increasing use of valve repair instead of replacement and refinement in surgical techniques have reduced the operative mortality across all age groups including the elderly.5,6

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0310.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207