MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2052370784 · doi:10.1139/p05-001

Accurate Kohn-Sham potential for the <i>1s2s <sup>3</sup>S</i> state of the helium atom: Tests of the locality and the ionization-potential theorems

2005· article· en· W2052370784 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sten Salomonson, Fredrik Möller, Ingvar Lindgren

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKohn–Sham equationsPhysicsHelium atomIonization energyEigenvalues and eigenvectorsAtomic physicsIonizationGround stateAtomic orbitalQuantum mechanicsRelaxation (psychology)Atom (system on chip)ElectronHeliumDensity functional theoryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The local Kohn–Sham potential is constructed for the 1s2s 3S state of the helium atom, using the procedure proposed by van Leeuwen and Baerends (Phys. Rev. A, 49, 2138 (1994)) and the many-body electron density, obtained from the pair-correlation program of Salomonson and Öster (Phys. Rev. A, 40, 5559 (1989)). The Kohn–Sham orbitals reproduce the many-body density very accurately, demonstrating the validity of the Kohn–Sham model and the locality theorem in this case. The ionization-potential theorem, stating that the Kohn–Sham energy eigenvalue of the outermost electron orbital agrees with the negative of the corresponding many-body ionization energy (including electronic relaxation), is verified in this case to nine digits. A Kohn–Sham potential is also constructed to reproduce the Hartree–Fock density of the same state, and the Kohn–Sham 2s eigenvalue is then found to agree with the same accuracy with the corresponding Hartree–Fock eigenvalue. This is consistent with the fact that in this model the energy eigenvalue equals the negative of the ionization energy without relaxation due to Koopmans' theorem. Related calculations have been performed previously, particularly for atomic and molecular ground states, but none of matching accuracy. In the computations presented here there is no conflict between the locality of the Kohn–Sham potential and the exclusion principle, as claimed by Nesbet (Phys. Rev. A, 58, R12 (1998)). PACS Nos.: 31.15.Ew, 31.15.Pf, 02.30.Sa

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies→French-language works237,207→