Skin cells, but not T cells, are resistant to indoleamine 2, 3‐dioxygenase (IDO) expressed by allogeneic fibroblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) expressed by dermal fibroblasts generated a tryptophan deficient environment in which immune cells, but not skin cells, undergo apoptosis. However, the mechanism by which primary skin cells such as fibroblasts and keratinocytes are resistant to this culture environment is not elucidated. Here, we asked the question of whether the activity of the general control nondepressing-2 (GCN2) kinase pathway in primary immune and skin cells is differently regulated in response to IDO-induced tryptophan deficient environment. Before addressing this question, the expression of IDO in IDO-adenoviral infected fibroblasts, as a source of IDO expression, was validated. We then demonstrated a significant immunosuppressive effect of IDO expression in primary human T cells co-cultured with IDO expressing fibroblasts in the presence of allogeneic pieces of either epidermis or full thickness skin. Evaluating the mechanism by which skin cells, but not T cells, are resistant to IDO induced low tryptophan environment, we then co-cultured IDO-expressing fibroblasts with bystander human T cells, the fibroblasts, or keratinocytes for 3 days. The results showed a significant activation of apoptotic pathway as analyzed by caspase-3 induction as well as the expression of CHOP, a downstream effector of GCN2 kinase pathway in T cells, but not in skin cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".