MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vascular Reactivity of Optic Nerve Head and Retinal Blood Vessels in Glaucoma - A Review

2010· review· en· W2052453633 on OpenAlexafffund
Subha T. Venkataraman, John G. Flanagan, Chris Hudson

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocirculation · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGlaucoma Research Society of Canada
KeywordsOptic nerveGlaucomaOphthalmologyMedicineIntraocular pressureOptic neuropathyOptic diskRetinalBlood flowRetinaOpen angle glaucomaHemodynamicsInternal medicineNeuroscienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaucoma is characterized by loss of retinal nerve fibers, structural changes to the optic nerve, and an associated change in visual function. The major risk factor for glaucoma is an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP). However, it has been demonstrated that a subset of glaucoma patients exhibit optic neuropathy despite a normal range of IOP. It has been proposed that primary open angle glaucoma could be associated with structural abnormalities and/or functional dysregulation of the vasculature supplying the optic nerve and surrounding retinal tissue. Under normal conditions, blood flow is autoregulated, i.e., maintained at a relatively constant level, in the retina and ONH, irrespective of variation in ocular perfusion pressure. A number of factors released by the vascular endothelium, including endothelin-1 and nitric oxide, are suggested to play an important role in the regulation of local perfusion in the retina and ONH. Most work to-date has investigated homeostatic hemodynamic parameters in glaucoma, rather than the measurement of the hemodynamic response to a provocation. Future work should comprehensively assess blood flow in all the ocular vascular beds and blood vessels supplying the eye in response to standardized stimuli in order to better understand the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocirculationSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207