MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052480747 · doi:10.1021/ac049265c

Infrared Spectroscopy for Chemically Specific Sensing in Silicon-Based Microreactors

2004· article· en· W2052480747 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rachel Herzig-Marx, K. T. Queeney, Rebecca J. Jackman, Martin A. Schmidt, Klavs F. Jensen

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyOntario Council on Graduate Studies, Council of Ontario UniversitiesCamille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation
KeywordsMicroreactorMicrofabricationChemistrySiliconEtching (microfabrication)Fourier transform infrared spectroscopyInfrared spectroscopyFourier transform spectroscopySpectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)FabricationChemical engineeringCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy in a multiple internal reflection (MIR) geometry is integrated with silicon-based microreactors to allow detection of a wide range of chemical species while taking advantage of inexpensive batch fabrication techniques applicable to silicon substrates. The microreactors are fabricated in silicon and glass using standard microfabrication and selective etching techniques. The small ( approximately 1 cm side) reactor size provides access to nearly the full mid-IR frequency region with MIR-FT-IR, allowing us to probe both solution-phase and surface-bound chemical transformations. The wide applicability of this approach is demonstrated with two representative test cases: kinetics of acid-catalyzed ethyl acetate hydrolysis and amidization of surface-tethered amine groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207