MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052573107 · doi:10.1109/mpae.2006.1687817

Implementation of online security assessment

2006· article· en· W2052573107 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Wang, K. Morison

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power and Energy Magazine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsPowertech Labs (Canada)
FundersSouthern Company
KeywordsSoftware deploymentRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceElectric power systemProcess (computing)Key (lock)Reliability engineeringReliability (semiconductor)Computer securitySecurity controlsGridSystems engineeringControl (management)EngineeringSoftware engineeringPower (physics)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The implementation of online dynamic security assessment (DSA) systems is growing worldwide, and the deployment of this advanced technology is expected to improve the real-time security and, hence, the reliability of power systems. While not insignificant, the cost and efforts required to install online DSA tools are minor compared to the benefits of reducing the volume of offline studies required and, more importantly, the benefits of identifying and avoiding potential security problems in the systems to reduce the risk of blackouts. Based on practical experience, a process of DSA system integration is presented that can assist utilities and grid operators in addressing key issues during the specification, development, and installation of such tools. A number of successful online DSA projects are discussed to illustrate the viability and practicality of such applications, even for large, complex power systems. The penetration of online DSA tools is expected to continue to grow as operators seek timely and cost-effective approaches to enhance system performance. In the meantime, work is continuing on new methods of online analysis, advanced preventive and corrective control tools, and improved hardware architectures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power and Energy MagazineSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207