MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052603231 · doi:10.1080/00150190600689647

Domain Wall Engineering in Barium Titanate Single Crystals for Enhanced Piezoelectric Properties

2006· article· en· W2052603231 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFerroelectrics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsPiezoelectricityMaterials scienceBarium titanateTetragonal crystal systemDomain (mathematical analysis)Domain wall (magnetism)Single domainComposite numberFerroelectricityTitanateDielectricCondensed matter physicsComposite materialCrystallographyCrystal structureCeramicOptoelectronicsMagnetic domainPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the [111] poled barium titanate (BaTiO 3 ) single crystals with the engineered domain configuration, it was clearly observed that the piezoelectric properties increased with decreasing domain sizes. To explain the phenomenon, the multidomain single crystals were regarded as the composite of (a) a distorted domain wall region and (b) a normal tetragonal domain region. Using a 2-phases model, the piezoelectric properties from the domain wall were estimated. As a result, ultrahigh piezoelectric constants over 8,000 pC/N were expected from the domain wall region. Moreover, this study suggested that it is possible to obtain the lead-free piezoelectric materials with the d 31 and d 33 over 1,000 pC/N, when the domain sizes can decrease below 1 μ m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it