Comparison of keV N<sub>2</sub><sup>+•</sup>/He and N<sub>2</sub><sup>+•</sup>/Ar Collisions by Emission Spectroscopy and Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collision-induced emission spectra from 190-1020 nm were obtained for N 2 (+*)/Ar collisions at laboratory frame collision energies from 2 to 8 keV. The relative emission intensities of N 2 (+*), N (+), and N (*) are independent of the ion translational energy within the studied energy range, supporting the curve-crossing mechanism for collisional excitation. The role of the target gas in keV N 2 (+*)/He and N 2 (+*)/Ar collisions was investigated by both emission spectroscopy and theoretical calculations. Adiabatic potential energy surfaces calculated at the CISD/6-311+G(2df) level of theory for N 2 (+*)/He and N 2 (+*)/Ar collisions indicate that excitation to the A (2)Pi u and B (2)Sigma u (+) states involves curve-crossing first to the C (2)Sigma u (+) state, and the difference in N 2 (+*) emission intensities from the two systems can be accounted for by the slope difference at the crossing points based on the Landau-Zener curve-crossing model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".