MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052645467 · doi:10.1042/bj20110584

Monoclonal antibodies reveal the alteration of the rhodocetin structure upon α2β1 integrin binding

2011· article· en· W2052645467 on OpenAlexafffund
Thilo Bracht, Flávia Rezende, Jörg Stetefeld, Lydia Sorokin, Johannes A. Eble

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemical Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsHeterotetramerProtein subunitMonoclonal antibodyIntegrinEpitopeChemistrySpecificity factorMolecular biologyBiochemistryBiologyAntibodyReceptorGeneticsPolymerase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The α2β1 antagonist rhodocetin from Calloselasma rhodostoma is a heterotetrameric CLRP (C-type lectin-related protein) consisting of four distinct chains, α, β, γ and δ. Via their characteristic domain-swapping loops, the individual chains form two subunits, αβ and γδ. To distinguish the four chains which share similar molecular masses and high sequence homologies, we generated 11 mAbs (monoclonal antibodies) with different epitope specificities. Four groups of distinct mAbs were generated: the first targeted the rhodocetin β chain, the second group bound to the αβ subunit mostly in a conformation-dependent manner, the third group recognized the γδ subunit only when separated from the αβ subunit, whereas a fourth group interacted with the γδ subunit both in the heterotetrameric molecule and complexed with the integrin α2 A-domain. Using the specific mAbs, we have shown that the rhodocetin heterotetramer dissociates into the αβ and γδ subunit upon binding to the integrin α2 A-domain at both the molecular and cellular levels. After dissociation, the γδ subunit firmly interacts with the α2β1 integrin, thereby blocking it, whereas the rhodocetin αβ subunit is released from the complex. The small molecular interface between the αβ and γδ subunits within rhodocetin is mostly mediated by charged residues, which causes the two dissociated subunits to have hydrophilic surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemical JournalSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207