MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052680281 · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.006

A very short visual analog form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for the idiographic measurement of depression

2010· article· en· W2052680281 on OpenAlexaff
Grégory Moullec, Christophe Maïano, Alexandre J. S. Morin, Johana Monthuy‐Blanc, Lisa Rosello, Grégory Ninot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyContext (archaeology)Convergent validityVisual analogue scaleNomothetic and idiographicCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression ScaleMeasurement invarianceDifferential item functioningDiscriminant validityClinical psychologyAffect (linguistics)Test validityConstruct validityPsychometricsDepression (economics)Item response theoryAnxietyConfirmatory factor analysisPsychiatryDepressive symptomsSocial psychologyStatisticsStructural equation modelingMedicinePhysical therapyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Affective DisordersSame topicMental Health Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207