A transient narrow poleward extrusion from the diffuse aurora and the concurrent magnetotail activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report observation of a transient narrow auroral feature extruding from the poleward boundary of the diffuse aurora on March 19, 2009. It moved westward and poleward initially to form part of a vortex pattern, followed by its equatorward‐dawnward retreat later. During this auroral activity, THEMIS satellites, projected near the same magnetic local time of the auroral feature, detected appreciable plasma flows, increase in the ratio of the ion energy over the electron energy, and some enhancements of electrostatic waves. The plasma flows were initially duskward‐earthward and changed to duskward‐tailward later. The overall development of the observed plasma flow pattern was detected during the equatorward‐dawnward retreat of the auroral feature when the Alfvén transit time between the magnetotail and the ionosphere is taken into account. This suggests that THEMIS satellites remotely sensed a counter‐clockwise flow vortex (viewed from above the equatorial plane) in the magnetotail with decreasing strength. We suggest that the process generating the auroral feature is related to the flow vortex in association with the depletion of the electron energy relative to the ion energy and wave‐particle interaction. An estimate of the possible associated current density is made. We provide reasoning for this auroral feature to be an auroral streamer and not a “failed” transpolar arc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".