Ejaculate-storage patterns and the site of fertilization in female snow crabs (<i>Chionoecetes opilio</i>; Brachyura, Majidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A light-microscopy study of mated female snow crabs (Chionoecetes opilio) was conducted to investigate the site of fertilization and to resolve how multiple ejaculates are stored in the spermathecae. In its basic configuration, an ejaculate consisted of a layer or patch of spermatophores enclosing mature spermatids that was capped by a relatively large volume of amorphous matter, which in turn could include a patch of spermatophores containing immature spermatids. Up to 10-12 ejaculates were stored in the spermathecae with the largest loads. An ejaculate was initially deposited in the intermediate chamber and ventral part of the spermatheca, and was displaced toward the dorsal part of the spermatheca when a new ejaculate was inserted. Ejaculates were neatly stratified along the ventrodorsal axis of spermathecae with small to moderate loads, but they were disrupted and the storage pattern was disorderly in spermathecae with large loads. Ejaculate stratification favors last-male sperm precedence and single-male paternity. However, multiple-male paternity might occur in females with large spermathecal loads, in part because several ejaculates can co-occur close to the oviduct opening. Mixing of male and female gametes in preparation for oviposition, and probably also fertilization, occurs to some degree in the ovaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".