Differing Flow Patterns between Ischemically Challenged Flap Skin and Flap Skeletal Muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the authors tested the hypothesis that there is a significant difference in spatial patterns of reflow in skin as opposed to skeletal muscle after an ischemic insult. The authors believe that this pathophysiologic difference between the two flap types has significant implications for flap salvage strategies. Bilateral buttock skin flaps (10 x 18 cm) and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps (10 x 20 cm) were elevated in Landrace pigs (n = 7). Flaps on one side of the animal were randomly assigned to 6 hours of arterial occlusion, with the contralateral side acting as control. At 15 minutes, 1 hour, and 4 hours after reflow, radioactive microspheres (15 microm) were injected into the left ventricle. After 18 hours of reperfusion, skin and muscle viability were estimated by intravenous fluorescein and soaking in nitroblue tetrazolium, respectively. Flow rates in the skin with an ischemia-reperfusion injury were significantly reduced (30 to 53 percent), at all time intervals, compared with controls. The flow rate in the fluorescent skin with ischemia-reperfusion injury of the latissimus dorsi flaps (0.037 ml/min/g at 15 min) was greater than in that of the buttock flaps (0.018 ml/min/g). The muscle flaps with ischemia-reperfusion injury had significantly higher flow rates than control muscle flaps at all time intervals studied (at 1 hour, 0.32 ml/min/g compared with 0.16 ml/min/g, respectively). In flap skeletal muscle, an early hyperemic phase during reperfusion maintains a significant blood flow to all regions, including the area of the flap that is destined for necrosis. In flap skin, however, there is a marked decrease in flow rates. These differences have important implications for the intravascular delivery of therapeutic agents to the damaged portions of the flap. Transdermal drug delivery systems should be explored as an alternative to intravascular regimens for the salvage of flap skin with ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".