Ca <sup>2+</sup> from One or Two Channels Controls Fusion of a Single Vesicle at the Frog Neuromuscular Junction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurotransmitter release is triggered by the cooperative action of approximately five Ca2+ ions entering the presynaptic terminal through Ca2+ channels. Depending on the organization of the active zone (AZ), influx through one or many channels may be needed to cause fusion of a vesicle. Using a combination of experiments and modeling, we examined the number of channels that contribute Ca2+ for fusion of a single vesicle in a frog neuromuscular AZ. We compared Ca2+ influx to neurotransmitter release by measuring presynaptic action potential-evoked (AP-evoked) Ca2+ transients simultaneously with postsynaptic potentials. Ca2+ influx was manipulated by changing extracellular [Ca2+] (Ca(ext)) to alter the flux per channel or by reducing the number of open Ca2+ channels with omega-conotoxin GVIA (omega-CTX). When Ca(ext) was reduced, the exponent of the power relationship relating release to Ca2+ influx was 4.16 +/- 0.62 (SD; n = 4), consistent with a biochemical cooperativity of approximately 5. In contrast, reducing influx with omega-CTX yielded a power relationship of 1.7 +/- 0.44 (n = 5) for Ca(ext) of 1.8 mM and 2.12 +/- 0.44 for Ca(ext) of 0.45 mM (n = 5). Using geometrically realistic Monte Carlo simulations, we tracked Ca2+ ions as they entered through each channel and diffused in the terminal. Experimental and modeling data were consistent with two to six channel openings per AZ per AP; the Ca2+ that causes fusion of a single vesicle originates from one or two channels. Channel cooperativity depends mainly on the physical relationship between channels and vesicles and is insensitive to changes in the non-geometrical parameters of our model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".