A comparison of the kinetics of low-density lipoprotein oxidation induced by copper or by γ-rays: Influence of radiation dose-rate and copper concentration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oxidation of low-density lipoproteins is the first step in the complex process leading to atherosclerosis. The aim of our study was to compare the kinetics of low density lipoprotein oxidation induced by copper ions or by oxygen free radicals generated by 60Co gamma-rays. The effects of copper concentration and irradiation dose-rate on LDL peroxidation kinetics were also studied. The oxidation of LDL was followed by the measurement of conjugated diene, hydroperoxides, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance formation as well as alpha-tocopherol disappearance. In the case of gamma irradiation, the lag-phase before the onset of lipid peroxidation was inversely correlated to the radiation dose-rate. The radiation chemical rates (nu) increased with increasing dose-rate. Copper-induced LDL peroxidation followed two kinetic patterns: a slow kinetic for copper concentrations between 5-20 microM, and a fast kinetic for a copper concentration of 40 microM. The concentration-dependent oxidation kinetics suggest the existence of a saturable copper binding site on apo-B. When compared with gamma-rays, copper ions act as drastic and powerful oxidants only at higher concentrations (> or = 40 microM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".