MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052980801 · doi:10.1115/gt2010-23586

Fault Diagnosis of Gas Turbine Engines by Using Dynamic Neural Networks

2010· article· en· W2052980801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Marine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceFault (geology)PerceptronGas turbinesMultilayer perceptronFault detection and isolationNetwork architectureControl engineeringIdentification (biology)Artificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel methodology for fault detection in gas turbine engines based on the concept of dynamic neural networks. The neural network structure belongs to the class of locally recurrent globally feed-forward networks. The architecture of the network is similar to the feed-forward multi-layer perceptron with the difference that the processing units include dynamic characteristics. The dynamics present in these networks make them a powerful tool useful for identification of nonlinear systems. The dynamic neural network architecture that is described in this paper is used for fault detection in a dual-spool turbo fan engine. A number of simulation studies are conducted to demonstrate and verify the advantages of our proposed neural network diagnosis methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it