Oxazoline chemistry. Part VIII. Synthesis and characterization of a new class of pincer ligands derived from the 2-(<i>o</i>-anilinyl)-2-oxazoline skeleton Applications to the synthesis of group X transition metal catalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis and characterization of a new and readily synthesized class of potentially anionic pincer ligands with C1 point group symmetries is described. These materials can be made via amide coupling of a 2-(2′-anilinyl)-2-oxazoline unit with picolinic acid; the incorporation of enantiopure oxazoline fragments facilitates the construction of chiral C1 pincers. Treatment of the free ligands with Pd metal sources leads to the formation of amidoPd pincer complexes in good yield. One of these Pd complexes has been characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction methods, which confirms the proposed tridentate binding mode of the ligand and the formation of an amido NPd bond. The metal complexes have been shown to be suitable precusors for catalytically active Pd species that are useful for CC bond forming reactions, notably the Heck reaction under standard conditions. Key words: oxazoline, 4,5-dihydro-2-oxazole, palladium, pincer ligand, amido, Heck reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".