MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052995399 · doi:10.1139/v05-163

Oxazoline chemistry. Part VIII. Synthesis and characterization of a new class of pincer ligands derived from the 2-(<i>o</i>-anilinyl)-2-oxazoline skeleton Applications to the synthesis of group X transition metal catalysts

2005· article· en· W2052995399 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
A. Decken, Robert A. Gossage, Paras Nath Yadav

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsOxazolineChemistryPincer movementEnantiopure drugPalladiumLigand (biochemistry)Heck reactionStereochemistryAmidePincer ligandCombinatorial chemistryPolymer chemistryCrystallographyOrganic chemistryCatalysisEnantioselective synthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis and characterization of a new and readily synthesized class of potentially anionic pincer ligands with C 1 point group symmetries is described. These materials can be made via amide coupling of a 2-(2′-anilinyl)-2-oxazoline unit with picolinic acid; the incorporation of enantiopure oxazoline fragments facilitates the construction of chiral C 1 pincers. Treatment of the free ligands with Pd metal sources leads to the formation of amido–Pd pincer complexes in good yield. One of these Pd complexes has been characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction methods, which confirms the proposed tridentate binding mode of the ligand and the formation of an amido N—Pd bond. The metal complexes have been shown to be suitable precusors for catalytically active Pd species that are useful for C—C bond forming reactions, notably the Heck reaction under standard conditions. Key words: oxazoline, 4,5-dihydro-2-oxazole, palladium, pincer ligand, amido, Heck reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207