MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2053039364 · doi:10.1118/1.3612353

SU‐E‐T‐399: CT Image Artifacts from Brachytherapy Seed Implants: The Impact of Seed Size and Motion

2011· article· en· W2053039364 on OpenAlexaff
Derek Wells, Parminder S. Basran, Andrew K. H. Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomBrachytherapyNuclear medicineDosimetryContrast-to-noise ratioImage qualityMedicineBiomedical engineeringRadiation therapyRadiologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To determine the impact of seed thickness on post‐operative CT image quality, seed detection and dosimetry, with and without breathing motion. Methods: An acrylic prostate phantom mounted to a computer controlled motion platform was created for both standard (5 × 1 mm)‐ and small (5 × 0.5 mm)‐diameter non‐radioactive I‐125 seeds (Oncura Inc., Arlington Heights, IL). Seed arrangement within the phantom was based on a patient brachytherapy plan. Ten low‐contrast inserts, 2, 5, and 10 mm in diameter with contrast differences of 2, 12 and 29 HU, respectively, were embedded in the phantom. Volumetric CT scans were performed while the phantom exhibited vertical, longitudinal and elliptical motion cycles of amplitudes 0, 2, and 5mm. Streak artifacts were quantified by sampling the standard deviation (SD) of pixel values over regions of interest (ROI) within the phantom volume. Soft tissue contrast was quantified by calculating the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) for each low‐contrast insert. Seed localization and dosimetry were assessed using VariSeed v8.0 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with prostate, rectal and urethral volumes copied from the patient plan onto the phantom. Results: Image noise was reduced with the small seeds for no motion cases (SD 49 vs. 32HU) and for 5mm amplitude cases (SD 60 vs. 37HU). CNR with the small seeds was higher by a median value of 55% for the low‐contrast ROIs. Although VariSeed identified more erroneous seed positions for the small seeds, there were no clinically significant dosimetric differences to the prostate, rectal or urethral volumes. Conclusions: The use of smaller seeds for prostate brachytherapy results in improved image quality of post‐operative CT scans, without hindering the ability in localizing the seeds or affecting the dose to the prostate, rectum or urethra, irrespective of motion parameters. Seeds used in this study were donated by GE Healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→