ICAM‐1 isoforms: specific activity and sensitivity to cleavage by leukocyte elastase and cathepsin G
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extracellular moiety of ICAM-1 consists of five Ig-like domains, the first and third domains mediating adhesion to integrin ligands. The ICAM-1 gene, however, gives rise to the expression of five alternative splice variants containing two, three, or four Ig-like domains. In this work, we have investigated whether the rearrangement of the architecture of ICAM-1 affects its structural properties and function. We showed that, in contrast to the common form, all alternative isoforms of ICAM-1 were susceptible to cleavage by leukocyte elastase and cathepsin G. We found that the length of an isoform did not influence the susceptibility to proteolysis. The molecular diversity provided by the skipping of entire Ig domains and the level of expression on the APC, however, significantly influenced their ability to potentiate the proliferation of T cells. Finally, we found that the expression of minor ICAM-1 isoforms encoding the third Ig-like domains was sufficient to sustain neutrophil infiltration in the liver and confer exon-5-targeted ICAM-1-deficient mice susceptibility to LPS-induced septic shock. These findings not only demonstrate that ICAM-1 isoforms are fully functional, but support the concept that alternative RNA splicing in the Ig superfamily may fulfill distinct roles during the development of the immune response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".