MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053098204 · doi:10.1172/jci42142

Retinopathy of prematurity: understanding ischemic retinal vasculopathies at an extreme of life

2010· review· en· W2053098204 on OpenAlexafffund
Przemysław Sapieha, Jean‐Sébastien Joyal, José Carlos Rivera, Elsa Kermorvant‐Duchemin, Florian Sennlaub, Pierre Hardy, Pierre Lachapelle, Sylvain Chemtob

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Investigation · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontMontreal Children's HospitalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Stroke NetworkCanadian Child Health Clinician Scientist ProgramCharles A. King TrustHealth Sciences Centre FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsRetinopathy of prematurityMedicineNeovascularizationRetinalRetinopathyRetinal detachmentRetinaPathogenesisOphthalmologyMacular degenerationIschemiaHypoxia (environmental)Retinal DisorderPathologyAngiogenesisNeuroscienceInternal medicineBiologyPregnancyEndocrinologyGestational age

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a major complication of preterm birth. It encompasses a spectrum of pathologies that affect vision, from mild disease that resolves spontaneously to severe disease that causes retinal detachment and subsequent blindness. The pathologies are characterized by an arrest in normal retinal vascular development associated with microvascular degeneration. The resulting ischemia and retinal hypoxia lead to excessive abnormal compensatory blood vessel growth. However, this neovascularization can lead to fibrous scar formation and culminate in retinal detachment. Present therapeutic modalities to limit the adverse consequences of aberrant neovascularization are invasive and/or tissue-destructive. In this Review, we discuss current concepts on retinal microvascular degeneration, neovascularization, and available treatments, as well as present future perspectives toward more profound elucidation of the pathogenesis of ROP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.346
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.086 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations275
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical InvestigationSame topicRetinopathy of Prematurity StudiesFrench-language works237,207