Hydrophobic tendencies of polar groups as a major force in molecular recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteins and nucleic acids are able to adopt their native conformation and perform their biological role only in the presence of water with which they actively interact in a mutually modifying way. Traditionally, hydrophobic effect has been considered to be the major factor stabilizing biopolymeric structures. However, solvent reorganization around polar groups is an event thermodynamically more unfavorable than solvent reorganization around nonpolar groups. Consequently, burial of polar groups with formation of complementary solute-solute hydrogen bonds out of contact with water is an energetically favorable process that also provides a major force driving macromolecular association and folding. In contrast to nonpolar groups, polar groups may form their complementary intra- or intersolute hydrogen bonds out of contact with water only provided that an appropriate solute structure has been formed with properly positioned hydrogen bond donors and acceptors. Formation of such structures is disfavored entropically and may not be possible due to steric reasons. However, the interior of a folded protein, alpha-helices and beta-sheets, double helical nucleic acid structures, and protein-ligand interfaces all provide rigid matrices where polar groups may form their complementary hydrogen bonds. For these structures, the inward drive of polar groups represents a considerable stabilizing factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".