MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heterogeneity in the ultrastructure of the mucous (goblet) cells of the rabbit palpebral conjunctiva

2004· article· en· W2053178966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Optometry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Houston
KeywordsGoblet cellConjunctivaStainingFixativeUltrastructurePathologyGranule (geology)Osmium tetroxideUranyl acetateMucusAnatomyFixation (population genetics)BiologyMucinElectron microscopeMedicineEpithelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess objectively the ultrastructure of the secretory granules in rabbit conjunctival mucin-producing 'goblet' cells. METHOD: The upper eyelids from five young adult dioestrous female rabbits were dissected out, stretched onto a cardboard support and prepared for transmission electron microscopy by repeated application of an isotonic two per cent glutaraldehyde fixative at room temperature. Post-fixation treatment included osmium tetroxide and staining with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Low magnification micrographs were taken of the goblet cells of the conjunctiva, printed at a magnification of approximately 6,000 and the number, size and features of the secretory granules assessed. RESULTS: Across the entire palpebral conjunctiva of all five rabbits, the majority of mucous cells displayed a goblet shape and the secretory granules were uniformly pale in staining. The average width of the goblet cells was 10.8 +/- 1.1 microm and the diameter of the secretory granules was 0.82 +/- 0.16 microm. However, in localised regions across the palpebral conjunctiva of two of the rabbits, some goblet cells were different in that the secretory granules had either a denser-staining core, in which some of the granules were densely staining (while others were pale) or most of the granules were densely staining. These mucous cells had an average diameter of 10.3 +/- 1.7 microm and the granule diameters averaged 0.88 +/- 0.01 microm. For these abnormal goblet cells, inflammatory cells were found in their immediate vicinity. Occasionally, goblet cells were seen to be in the process of degranulation with associated apparent cell necrosis and the mucin granule diameter was close to 1 microm. CONCLUSIONS: The ultrastructure of the mucin-containing secretory granules of the conjunctival mucous cells is not necessarily homogeneous in character and further attention needs to be given to the effects of localised inflammation in the tissue and to possible hormonal influences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it