MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Radiation-Induced Craniofacial Bone Growth Inhibition: Efficacy of Cytoprotection following a Fractionated Dose Regimen

2005· article· en· W2053243774 on OpenAlexaff
Giorgio C. La Scala, David A. O Donovan, Ivan Yeung, Johnson Darko, Patrick Addison, Peter C. Neligan, Cho Y. Pang, Christopher R. Forrest

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAmifostineCraniofacialRadiation therapyNuclear medicineRegimenBone growthUrologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Severe craniofacial growth disturbances are noted in 66 to 100 percent of children with head and neck cancers who received radiotherapy during their growing years. The authors have previously demonstrated the prevention of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition following single-dose orthovoltage radiation to the orbitozygomatic complex in an infant rabbit model through the administration of the cytoprotective agent amifostine (WR-2721) before radiation treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of cytoprotection using a fractionated dose regimen that better approximates the clinical application of radiation therapy. METHODS: Thirty 7-week-old male New Zealand rabbits were randomized into three groups (n = 10), each receiving six fractions of orthovoltage radiation to the right orbitozygomatic complex: group C, sham irradiation control; group F35, total dose of 35 Gy; and group F35A, total dose of 35 Gy with administration of amifostine 200 mg/kg intravenously 20 minutes before each fraction. Bone growth was evaluated up to skeletal maturity (age 21 weeks) with serial radiographs and computed tomography scans for cephalometric analysis, bone volume, and bone density measurements. RESULTS: Fractionated radiation resulted in significant (p < 0.05) bone growth inhibition compared with sham radiation in 16 of 21 cephalometric parameters measured and significantly (p < 0.05) reduced bone volume of the rabbit orbitozygomatic complex. Pretreatment with amifostine before each radiation fraction prevented growth deformities in four cephalometric parameters and significantly (p < 0.05) attenuated these effects in another seven parameters compared with radiated animals. Bone volumes were also significantly (p < 0.05) improved in F35A animals compared with F35 animals. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes that fractionation of orthovoltage radiation does not prevent the development of growth disturbances of the rabbit craniofacial skeleton and also demonstrates that preirradiation administration of amifostine is highly effective in the prevention and attenuation of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicOral health in cancer treatmentFrench-language works237,207