MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053258442 · doi:10.1021/es7029703

Degradation of Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate (PETN) by Granular Iron

2008· article· en· W2053258442 on OpenAlexafffund
Li Zhuang, Lai Gui, Robert W. Gillham

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsPentaerythritol tetranitrateChemistryPentaerythritolTrinitrotolueneDegradation (telecommunications)NitriteDissolutionSolubilityInorganic chemistryExplosive materialNitrateNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistryFire retardant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), a nitrate ester, is used primarily as an explosive. It is of environmental concern, posing a threat to aquatic organisms with an estimated EC50 five times greater than that of RDX. This study evaluated the kinetics and products of PETN degradation in the presence of granular iron. PETN transformation in columns containing 100% granular iron and 30% iron mixed with 70% silica sand followed pseudo first-order kinetics, with average half-lives of 0.26 and 1.58 min, respectively. The reduction pathway was proposed to be sequential denitration, in which PETN was stepwise reduced to pentaerythritol with the formation of pentaerythritol trinitrate and pentaerythritol dinitrate as intermediates. The intermediate of pentaerythritol mononitrate was not detected; however, the nearly 100% nitrogen mass recovery supported complete denitration. Nitrite was released in each denitration step and was subsequently reduced to ammonium by iron. Nitrate was not detected during the experiment suggesting that hydrolysis was not involved in PETN degradation. Batch experiments showed that when solid-phase PETN is present, dissolution is the rate-limiting factorfor PETN mass removal. Using 50% methanol as a cosolvent PETN solubility was enhanced and thus the removal efficiency was improved. The results demonstrate excellent potential of using iron to remediate PETN-contaminated water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsFrench-language works237,207