Evaluation of a Comprehensive Care Clinic Model for Children With Brain Tumor and Risk for Hypothalamic Obesity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to evaluate outcomes of a comprehensive care clinic (CCC) for children with hypothalamic obesity due to treatment for brain tumors by assessing weight parameters; health-related quality of life (HRQoL); and perception of health status, disease burden, care satisfaction, and physical activity. Thirty-nine patients (16 males) were reviewed. While attending the CCC the median %weight gain and percent ideal body weight (%IBW) of patients was lower (8.5%/year (range -3 to -14) and -4%/year (141.7-34), respectively) than the median %weight gain and %IBW (21.4% (15.8-32.0) and 19.9% (-18.7 to 149.2)) while treated in standard care. Rate of increase in %BMI slowed (4.5 kg/m(2) %/year (-17.8 to 8.4) vs. 8.4 kg/m(2) %/year (-3.1 to 28.1)) in patients attending the clinic compared to their before treatment in standard care. There was no change in blood pressure, fasting glucose, triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.09 +/- 0.33 to 1.24 +/- 0.04). After attending the CCC for a year, significant increases for child reported total HRQoL (63.7 +/- 18.4-71.3 +/- 13.3; P < 0.017), physical functioning (65.3 +/- 15.9-69.5 +/- 15.9; P < 0.045) and school functioning (61.1 +/- 21.0-71.1 +/- 16.5; P < 0.051) were found. Parents reported no significant change in HRQoL over the same period. Parents had significantly improved responses in areas of coordination of health care and understanding of their child's disease. Patients attending the CCC gained less weight while attending the clinic and exhibited improved HRQoL. Parents noticed improvements in various areas of their child's medical care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".