Growth Rate of the California Sea Cucumber <i>Parastichopus californicus</i>: Measurement Accuracy and Relationships between Size and Weight Metrics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Management of the fishery for California sea cucumbers Parastichopus californicus in the Pacific Northwest is limited by a lack of natural growth rate estimates. Growth rates of caged juvenile California sea cucumbers (from Departure Bay, British Columbia) consuming a natural diet for 12 months (September 2008–September 2009) were examined. Growth was low between September and March but significantly increased thereafter, appearing to follow seasonal physiological processes, temperature, and natural sedimentation rates. Over the 12-month period, whole wet weight in air (WWA) increased by an average of 164%, immersed whole weight (IWW) increased by 251%, and the size index (SI) increased by 85%. Average standard growth rates were 0.267%/d for WWA, 0.346%/d for IWW, and 0.169%/d for SI. Measurement accuracy, effects of body content, and relationships between size and weight metrics are discussed. These findings are an important addition to the knowledge of California sea cucumber biology and are valuable for the stock assessment, fisheries management, and aquaculture of this species. Received January 1, 2011; accepted November 10, 2011
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".