A revision of the late Eocene snakeflies (Raphidioptera) of the Florissant Formation, Colorado, with special reference to the wing venation of the Raphidiomorpha
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The snakeflies (Raphidioptera) of the late Eocene Florissant Formation (Colorado, USA) are revised. Seven species of Raphidiidae are assigned to three genera, i.e., Megaraphidia Cockerell, 1907, Archiraphidia Handlirsch, 1910, and Florissantoraphidia gen. nov. Dictyoraphidia Handlirsch, 1910 is assigned to Baissopteridae, a first Cenozoic record of the family. Archiraphidia tumulata (Scudder, 1890), A. tranquilla (Scudder, 1890) and A.? somnolenta (Scudder, 1890), stat. res. are treated as distinct species, and A. eventa (Scudder, 1890) as a new synonym of A. tranquilla. The lectotype of A. eventa is designated. 'Raphidia' exhumata Cockerell, 1909 is transferred to Megaraphidia. 'Raphidia' mortua Rohwer, 1909 and 'R.' funerata Engel, 2003 constitute Florissantoraphidia gen. nov. Our findings support the treatment of the single Florissant species of Inocelliidae as preliminary assigned to Fibla Navás, 1915. We examine venational synapomorphies of Raphidiomorpha and provide a new diagnosis for it based on these characters. We evaluate putative derived venational character states of 'Neoraphidioptera' (Inocelliidae and Raphidiidae), finding no clear synapomorphy supporting its validity; these families may nest separately within a paraphyletic Mesoraphidiidae (s.l.). We provide diagnoses for the families occurring at Florissant (Baissopteridae, Inocelliidae and Raphidiidae) based on wing venation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".