Adverse Ventilatory Strategy Causes Pulmonary-to-Systemic Translocation of Endotoxin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accumulating evidence strongly suggests that ventilatory strategy has an important impact on development of lung injury and patient outcome. Adverse ventilatory strategies have been shown to cause release of pulmonary-derived cytokines and may permit bacterial translocation from the lung to the systemic circulation. Because endotoxin is a potent and clinically important stimulant of cytokine-mediated systemic inflammatory responses that can lead to multiorgan failure, we investigated the effects of ventilatory strategy on lung-to-systemic translocation of endotoxin. We studied the effects of protective (tidal volume [VT] 5 ml. kg(-)(1), positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] 10 to 12.5 cm H(2)O) versus nonprotective (VT 12 ml. kg(-)(1), PEEP zero) ventilatory strategy on translocation of endotracheally instilled endotoxin. Anesthetized New Zealand White rabbits were subjected to saline lung lavage, and 32 were randomized to one of four groups: PS (protective ventilation + instilled saline); PE (protective ventilation + instilled endotoxin); NS (nonprotective ventilation + instilled saline); NE (nonprotective ventilation + instilled endotoxin), and ventilated for 3 h. Plasma endotoxin levels increased significantly in the NE group, and remained low and unchanged in the other groups. Peak levels of plasma tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were higher in NE versus other groups. Pa(O(2)) and mean arterial pressure (Pa) were lowest, and requirement for pressor and bicarbonate support greatest, in the NE group. Finally, plasma endotoxin levels were significantly greater in eventual nonsurvivors than survivors. These data provide convincing evidence for pulmonary translocation of lung-derived endotoxin. This translocation depends on ventilatory strategy, and suggests a pathophysiologic link between ventilatory strategy and outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".