Sedimentology of the tide-dominated Jurassic Lajas Formation, Neuquén Basin, Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tidal depositional systems are often interpreted as lowstand/transgressive estuarine deposits within sequences that are either wave or river dominated during highstand times. The Middle Jurassic Lajas Formation of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina, comprises 600 m of well-exposed tide-dominated facies deposited within four unconformitybounded sequences, spanning approximately 4.5 Ma. Facies associations include tidedominated deltas, sandy-heterolithic tidal channel fills and extensive progradational tidal-flat successions, which are locally cut by heterolithic tidal channel fills. Despite the narrow bathymetric depositional range and the complex facies variability, flooding surfaces can be defined and mapped along a 48 km-long outcrop belt. These flooding surfaces allow definition of three distinct types of parasequence that exhibit coarsening-upwards, finingupwards and coarsening- to fining-upwards motifs. Sequence boundaries are marked by widespread, but shallow, incision, and the juxtaposition of stacked fluvial/tidal channel fills on a variety of subtidal and intertidal facies. Unconventional grain-size changes at sequence boundaries can occur where basinward facies shifts are marked by juxtaposition of heterolithic-argillaceous intertidal/supratidal mudflat deposits on subtidal sandflat facies. The maintenance of macrotidal conditions through complete base-level cycles is interpreted as being due to the structural topography inherited from rifting, causing the whole sub-basin to behave as a structurally controlled embayment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".